Acute Kidney Injury Resulting From Hemoglobinuria After Pulsed-Field Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: Is it Preventable?

BACKGROUND: High-voltage pulses can cause hemolysis. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the occurrence of hemoglobinuria after pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and its impact on renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A consecutive series of patients with AF undergoing PFA were included in this analysis. The initial patients who did not receive postablation hydration immediately after the procedure were classified as group 1 (n = 28), and the rest of the study patients who received planned fluid infusion (0.9% sodium chloride ≥2 L) after the procedure were categorized as group 2 (n = 75). RESULTS: Of the 28 patients in group 1, 21 (75%) experienced hemoglobinuria during the 24 hours after catheter ablation. The mean postablation serum creatinine (S-Cr) was significantly higher than the baseline value in those 21 patients (1.46 ± 0.28 mg/dL vs 0.86 ± 0.24 mg/dL, P < 0.001). Of those 21 patients, 4 (19%) had S-Cr. >2.5 mg/dL (mean: 2.95 ± 0.21 mg/dL). The mean number of PF applications was significantly higher in those 4 patients than in the other 17 patients experiencing hemoglobinuria (94.63 ± 3.20 vs 46.75 ± 9.10, P < 0.001). In group 2 patients, no significant changes in S-Cr were noted. The group 2 patients received significantly higher amounts of fluid infusion after catheter ablation than did those in group 1 (2,082.50 ± 258.08 mL vs 494.01 ± 71.65 mL, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, both hydration (R2 = 0.63, P < 0.01) and number of PFA applications (R2 = 0.33, P < 0.01) were independent predictors of postprocedure acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our findings, both the number of PFA applications and postablation hydration were independent predictors of renal insult that could be prevented using planned fluid infusion immediately after the procedure.

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and procedural outcome in patients undergoing catheter ablation for premature ventricular complexes.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC) are common arrhythmias. We aimed to investigate AF prevalence in patients with PVC and its impact on PVC ablation outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PVC ablation at a single institution between 2016 and 2019 were included and prospectively followed for 2 years. Patients with severe valvular heart disease, hyperthyroidism, malignancy, alcohol use disorder and advanced renal/hepatic diseases were excluded. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were used to diagnose AF and assess PVC morphology. All PVCs were targeted for ablation using 4-mm irrigated-tip catheters at standardized radiofrequency power guided by 3-D mapping and intracardiac echocardiography. Patients were followed with remote monitoring, device interrogations and office visits every 6 months for 2 years. Detection of any PVCs in follow-up was considered as recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 394 patients underwent PVC ablation and 96 (24%) had concurrent AF. Patients with PVC and AF were significantly older (68.2 ± 10.8 vs. 58.3 ± 15.8 years, p < .001), had lower LV ejection fraction (43.3 ± 13.3% vs. 49.6 ± 12.4%, p < .001), higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc (2.8 ± 1.3 vs. 2.0 ± 1.3, p < .001) than those without. PVCs with ≥2 morphologies were detected in 60.4% and 13.7% patients with vs without AF (p < .001). At 2-year follow-up, PVC recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with vs without AF (17.7% vs. 9.4%, p = .02). CONCLUSION: AF was documented in 1/4 of patients undergoing PVC ablation and was associated with lower procedural success at long-term follow-up. This was likely attributed to older age, worse LV function and higher prevalence of multiple PVC morphologies in patients with concurrent AF.

Endocardial Scar-Homogenization With vs Without Epicardial Ablation in VT Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors investigated the ablation success of scar homogenization with combined (epicardial + endocardial) vs endocardial-only approach for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) at 5 years of follow-up. BACKGROUND: Best ablation approach to achieve long-term success rate in VT patients with ICM is not known yet. METHODS: Consecutive ICM patients undergoing VT ablation at our center were classified into group 1: endocardial + epicardial scar homogenization and group 2: endocardial scar homogenization. Patients with previous open heart surgery were excluded. Epicardial ablation was performed despite being noninducible after endocardial ablation in all group 1 patients. All patients underwent bipolar substrate mapping with standard scar settings defined as normal tissue >1.5 mV and severe scar <0.5 mV. Noninducibility of monomorphic VT was the procedural endpoint in both groups. Patients were followed up every 4 months for 5 years with implantable device interrogations. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients (group 1: n = 70 and group 2: n = 291) were included in the study. At 5 years, 81.4% (n = 57/70) patients from group 1 and 66.3% (n = 193/291) from group 2 were arrhythmia-free (P = 0.01) Of those patients, 26 of 57 (45.6%) and 172 of 193 (89.1%) from group 1 and group 2 respectively were on anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) (log-rank P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and obstructive sleep apnea, endo-epicardial scar homogenization was associated with a significant reduction in arrhythmia-recurrence (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27-0.86; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of patients with ICM and VT, epicardial substrate was detected in all group 1 patients despite being noninducible after endocardial ablation. Moreover, combined endo-epicardial scar homogenization was associated with a significantly higher success rate at 5 years of follow-up and a substantially lower need for antiarrhythmic drugs after the procedure compared with the endocardial ablation alone.